![]() ![]() ![]() GNU/Linux with NVIDIA drivers that support OpenGL 4.5 and above.For Linux hosts, a NVIDIA GPU is required.For Windows hosts, a GPU that supports DirectX 11.0 is required.Support for DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.1 in the Guest.Maybe these updates are part of the reason for the performance I experienced today. The latest version lists the following graphics-related improvements. ![]() If the solution is viable, I will make the transition to running Linux on the host and Windows 10 only as a virtual machine using VMware Workstation 16 Pro. I need to continue testing the VM to make sure the performance is what I need for my photography programs. I originally set up the virtual machine to test some software without impacting my primary Windows 10 system. Yes, I am running Windows 10 on the host and use another license to run a virtual machine with Windows 10 installed as well. Convincing Topaz samples appear occasionally on the retouching forum. So if your VM takes control of certain threads whereas your host would have them jumping around more, this could account for the small speed bump.īut again, 1 second is very miniscule so that might just be within the margin of error.ĭid I interpret you correctly, are you running a W10 virtual machine in VMware Workstation on W10? I wasn't aware that you could double license Windows in that manner maybe you obtained a 2nd license.Īpparently Topaz "AI" programs are the first to move beyond Neat Image (and so forth) of the last decade. This seems counterintuitive but your processors cores aren't being shared when they're being used. While 1 second seems negligible, if you're assigning all cores to your VM, the VM not having a lot of other things running may mean that it's making better use of the processors. That said, CPU scheduling can be complicated to the point that when ESXi, I just leave it alone and let the host do all of the scheduling. But Premiere Pro doesn't even take up 50% of CPU when rendering and I have nothing that taxes the processor so I find that there's really no point. I have a 3900x and at first, I second-guessed whether I should have gone for the 3950x for the extra 4 cores/8 threads. There's no question being asked, I know you're just posting an observation. I hate dual booting, so having a single computer that can run photo-related tools in a virtual machine, when needed, is what I hope to achieve. I'm currently running a Linux system (main computer) and a Windows system (mostly just for photo developing/editing). Reducing the number of computers I use at home would be great. I need to keep testing (and include Capture One), but if the results hold up, I am going to try installing Linux on the host along with VMWare Workstation to see if I can move to a virtual environment for my photography work. ![]() I made sure the program settings are the same (including use GPU instead of CPU) and I expected the virtual machine to be a bit slower. I have been testing this by cleaning, sharpening, and exporting the same TIFFs with each instance of the Topaz software, and so far the virtual machine is faster by about 1 second. My understanding is that the VMWare workstation svga driver is able to work with the host graphics card without a lot of performance reduction, so I decided to install a second copy of Topaz DeNoise AI in the virtual machine to compare processing time with the DeNoise copy running on the host. I have a copy of VMWare Workstation Pro 16 installed on the Windows 10 system and also have an instance of Windows 10 built as a virtual machine. My Windows 10 system is an I7-4790 with 32 GB of memory, Samsung EVO SSDs for boot and data, and an Nvidia 1660s graphics card. I prefer to use Linux for most of my computing, but there are some Windows 10 programs, such as Topaz products and Capture One, that I intend to keep using. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |